Logical Statements

Statement

Statement

A statement is a sentence that is either True or False.

This statement is True. 5 is greater than 2.

This is a False statement, it is not wrongly written, it is a VALID False statement

This is NOT a statement, since we don't know what value is without any context

Vacuously True

When the hypothesis is false, the statement is vacuously true, but true in a sense of unimportant, or uninteresting, or vacuous sense

New Statements

  • means NOT , inverts the value of the statement.
  • , means AND , this says "both statements and ..."
  • , means OR

Example

"My shirt is gray but my shorts are not"

  • : "my shirt is gray"
  • : "my shorts are gray"
  • "but" is logically the same thing as "and"
    So the sentence above can be logically traduced as the logical form:

Conditional Statement

Conditional Statement

Denoted as means "if is True then is True"

T T T F T
T F F F F
F T T T T
F F T T T

The implications is vacuously TRUE because there is no reason to think it is false.
The implication has the same truth table as the statement , so these are logical equivalent.

If I study hard, then I will pass if then
Either I don't study hard, or I pass Either or

Contrapositive

If I study hard, then I will pass.
Either I didn't study hard, or I pass.
If I don't pass, then I didn't study hard.
Either I pass, or I didn't study hard.

All these four statements are logical equivalents.

Negating a conditional

So the only way an implication can be false, is when the hypothesis is True but the conclusion is False

Converse & Inverse

Converse

The Converse of a statement is the statement . This is NOT logically equivalent.

Inverse

The Inverse of a statement is the statement . Is the converse of the contrapositive. So inverse converse but not logically equivalent to the original statement

Biconditional Statements

Biconditional

The biconditional means that both and .

If I study hard, then I will pass AND if I pass, then I studied hard:
I will pass if and only if I study hard:

These both are logically equivalent

Necessary & Sufficient Conditions

Necessary and Sufficient
  • " is necessary for " means .
  • " is sufficient for " means .
  • If is necessary and sufficient for , then .

If we want a Rectangle
It is sufficient to have a Square
But necessary to have a Quadrilateral

Argument

Valid Argument

A valid argument is a list of premises(statements) from which the conclusion follows

Modus Ponens

Modus Ponens

Modus Ponens is an argument of the form:

Variables Variables | Premises Premises | Conclusion
|
|
T T | T T T
T F | F T (don't care)
F T | T F (don't care)
F F | T F (don't care)

We don't really care of the cases where the conclusion is not true because in those scenarios the premises are not satisfied. In this logical argument I am assuming that both of my premises are true, and if they are not true I don't care

Modus Tollens

Modus Tollens

Modus Tollens is an argument of the form:

If , then .
.
Therefore, .

If I'm the USA President then I'm an American citizen.
I'm not an American citizen.
Therefore, I'm not the USA President.

Generalization

Generalization

Generalization is an argument of the form:

.
Therefore, .

It is basically the idea that if I have some true statement, the disjunction with any other statement will always be true.

I'm a Canadian.
Therefore, I'm a Canadian or I'm a unicorn.

Specialization

Specialization

Opposite of generalization, specialization is an argument of the form:

.
Therefore, .

I'm a Canadian and I have a PhD.
Therefore, I'm a Canadian. .

Contradiction

Contradiction

Contradiction is an argument of the form:


Therefore, .

If I assume my premise to be false, and this implies a contradiction, then the premise is true.

.

Tautology

Tautology

A tautology is a statement that is always true. is always a tautology.

T T T
T F T

"A dog is a mammal"

Contradiction

Contradiction

A contradiction is a statement that is always false. is always a contradiction.

F T F
F F F

"A dog is a reptile"